Duck and Cover

I have seen couple of New Vegas reviews and find it kinda enoying that no revier had any clue about the game or even who made it.

Coments like:
"If you like fallout 3 you will like this and if you didnt like fallout 3 you wont like this."

"You cant continue playing the game after you finish the last quest, i wonder why designers are making same mistake as with fallout 3? "

"You will go around shoting alot of monsters" -this while showing supermutants videos.

"This is in no way a new game, its more like an expansion of fallout 3."


These kinds of coments are not coming from stupid bethesda fankids, it from reviews of IGN and simillar gamesites.

So where are the angry fallout fans storming these sites and youtube videos with angry posts?

Haris wrote:So where are the angry fallout fans storming these sites and youtube videos with angry posts?

They're tired and weary, friend. They don't acknowledge sissy game sites that write sissy reviews for sissies.
Here, have a beer and some beef jerky and let's kick back. There's nothing we can do, so why bother trying?

Except that IGN and "simillar gamesites" are stupid Bethesda fankids.

Haris wrote:"You cant continue playing the game after you finish the last quest, i wonder why designers are making same mistake as with fallout 3? "

lawd this one annoys the heck out of me. I don't understand why people feel entitled to play after the story ends? whatever

I seriosly got nothing against fallout 3, i liked the game, it wasnt fallout but alot of games i play and like arent fallout. And i forgive bethesda as they seem to have done something right by letting obsidian develot a spinoff. So basicly they saved fallout in the end.

But for some reason i am starting go "angry fanboy style" on alot of reviews. Something i never done before.