Duck and Cover Forum Index


Use these links, buy stuff from Amazon and help us out, nubs.
Amazon.com | Amazon.ca | Amazon.co.uk | Amazon.de
  Duck and Cover  •  FAQ  •  Search  •  Memberlist  •  Usergroups   •  Register  •  Profile  •  Log in to check your private messages  •  Log in

 Support DAC!
 The Court Lacks Jurisdiction, and Bethesda's Lawyers Talk BS View next topic
View previous topic
Post new topicReply to topic
Author Message
King of Creation
Righteous Subjugator
Righteous Subjugator


Joined: 20 Dec 2003
Posts: 5103

PostPosted: Thu Dec 10, 2009 5:49 am Reply with quoteBack to top

[ Company -> Update ] - More info on Company: Bethesda v. Interplay

So says Interplay...

In their latest round of court filings, which DAC has obtained, Interplay is claiming that the court lacks jurisdiction to proceed with the case.

This Court lacks subject matter jurisdiction to consider this case and the action must,
therefore, be dismissed. This case is nothing more than a contract dispute that happens to
involve the use of trademarks. As such, the claims and allegations at issue do not arise under the
Lanham Act but, instead, they arise under, and will be disposed by, interpretations of the
contracts involved. Therefore, this action is a state court action that this Court cannot decide.

In addition, Interplay is claiming that one of Bethesda's affidavits is complete BS and should be thrown out. They claim that the affidavit of James Leder is "based on information and belief, rather than personal knowledge," and should be thrown out.

There are a few points in Leder's affidavit that Interplay has issues with, particularly:

As a result of the inherent distinctivness of the FALLOUT Mark, and the efforts of Bethesda to finance, develop, advertise and promote "Fallout 3" over several years, Bethesda's customers and the public in general have come to know and recognize the FALLOUT Mark and to associate the Mark with Bethesda.

Ummmmmmmmm, I don't know about you, but when I think of the word "Fallout," this is the first thing that comes to mind:

More on this later when I get home from work and have time to transcribe more of the doc.

And I'm back home from work and have had a proper read through the documents. There's not much else worth posting from the anti-Leder argument. Interplay picks apart the Leder Affidavit pretty thoroughly, much like Roshambo picking apart a noob's argument on the forums.

There is one particularly intersting bit in the motion, though, which backs up pretty well Interplay's argument to have the Leder Affidavit thrown:

Rule 602 of the Federal Rules of Evidence provides that "a witness may not testify to a matter unless evidence is introduced sufficient to support a finding that the witness has personal knowledge of the matter."

The entire affidavit and the specific portions of the Leder Affidavit cited above, are all made on information and belief, and are therefore lacking in personal knowledge. The entire affidavit, or alternatively, the inadmissable portions of the declaration should be stricken. This will result in an insufficient showing that Bethesda is entitled to a preliminary injunction.

View user's profileSend private messageVisit poster's website
Wolfman Walt
Mamma's Gang member
Mamma's Gang member


Joined: 15 Mar 2003
Posts: 5171
Location: La Grange, Kentucky

PostPosted: Thu Dec 10, 2009 11:04 am Reply with quoteBack to top

Legally speaking, and this is to the best of my legaleze, Interplay has Leder in that department as the argument is based on what Leder assumes rather than any actual factual evidence. It's almost like hearsay. Leder could argue that Bethesda is TRYING to associate their company with Fallout, but not that it is factual truth that when people say Fallout they think "BETHESDA!"
View user's profileSend private messageSend e-mailVisit poster's websiteAIM AddressYahoo MessengerMSN Messenger
SenisterDenister
250 Posts til Somewhere
250 Posts til Somewhere


Joined: 23 Apr 2007
Posts: 2995
Location: Cackalackyland

PostPosted: Thu Dec 10, 2009 6:59 pm Reply with quoteBack to top

Shit's all fucked up.
View user's profileSend private message
Kashluk
Grand MF
Grand MF


Joined: 15 May 2003
Posts: 7498

PostPosted: Thu Dec 10, 2009 7:04 pm Reply with quoteBack to top

Wolfman Walt wrote:
Legally speaking, and this is to the best of my legaleze, Interplay has Leder in that department as the argument is based on what Leder assumes rather than any actual factual evidence. It's almost like hearsay. Leder could argue that Bethesda is TRYING to associate their company with Fallout, but not that it is factual truth that when people say Fallout they think "BETHESDA!"


The underlined part is the core issue, I think. Since there's been a considerable time gap between the earlier (Interplay-made) games and Bethesda's been throwing away insane amounts of money to all forms of marketing and as bribes to gaming magazines in the past years, it really can be argued that Bethesda has done 'all in its power' to enforce the association, no matter how succesful it has been in the end.
View user's profileSend private message
King of Creation
Righteous Subjugator
Righteous Subjugator


Joined: 20 Dec 2003
Posts: 5103

PostPosted: Thu Dec 10, 2009 7:13 pm Reply with quoteBack to top

New post with Bethesda's response to this!
View user's profileSend private messageVisit poster's website
Ausir
The Vault Overseer
The Vault Overseer


Joined: 22 Apr 2002
Posts: 1272
Location: Poland

PostPosted: Thu Dec 10, 2009 7:14 pm Reply with quoteBack to top

Bethesda has filed an opposition to Interplay's motion to strike the Leder affidavit:

http://fallout.wikia.com/wiki/User_blog:Ausir/Interplay_motions_to_strike,_Bethesda_opposes
View user's profileSend private messageVisit poster's websiteAIM AddressYahoo MessengerMSN MessengerICQ Number
King of Creation
Righteous Subjugator
Righteous Subjugator


Joined: 20 Dec 2003
Posts: 5103

PostPosted: Thu Dec 10, 2009 7:22 pm Reply with quoteBack to top

King of Creation wrote:
New post with Bethesda's response to this!
View user's profileSend private messageVisit poster's website
Smiley
Righteous Subjugator
Righteous Subjugator


Joined: 18 Apr 2002
Posts: 3186
Location: Denmark. Smiley-land.

PostPosted: Thu Dec 10, 2009 7:51 pm Reply with quoteBack to top

senisterdenister wrote:
Shit's all fucked up.


http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=D-nquzsKpTQ
View user's profileSend private messageVisit poster's websiteAIM Address
Display posts from previous:      
Post new topicReply to topic


Jump to:  



View next topic
View previous topic
You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot vote in polls in this forum


Powered by phpBB © 2001, 2005 phpBB Group