Duck and Cover Forum Index

  Duck and Cover  •  FAQ  •  Search  •  Memberlist  •  Usergroups   •  Register  •  Profile  •  Log in to check your private messages  •  Log in

 Support DAC!
 A More Realistic Review? View next topic
View previous topic
Post new topicReply to topic
Author Message
King of Creation
Righteous Subjugator
Righteous Subjugator

Joined: 20 Dec 2003
Posts: 5103

PostPosted: Thu Dec 04, 2008 3:12 am Reply with quoteBack to top

[ Game -> Review ] - More info on Game: Fallout 3

Most, if not all, of the reviews that we have seen all have inflated scores and a general lack of in depth review. They all buy into the hype and just give Fallout 3 its 10/10 or A+. Once in a while, though, we come across a review that's a little bit closer to reality. This one is from Edge Online. Here are some highlights:

But as enticing as such snapshots are, slightly longer exposures to Bethesda’s post-apocalyptic RPG can prove less palatable – perhaps a fitting problem to have, given the irradiated setting. Five-minute slices of Fallout 3 show it at its absolute worst. Gormlessly unsympathetic to the player’s needs, the game is cumbersome in design and frequently incompetent in the details of execution.

With a stripped-down HUD, nearly all information, inventory and statistical management is remanded to the Pip-Boy 3000, a cramped retro screen mounted on your arm, with chunky dials and flickering green-on-black text. It’s an idea that probably sounded great to Bethesda’s artists, but overlooks the fact that computing has improved in usability over the last 50 years.


Many of these foibles are shared by Bethesda’s previous epic RPG, The Elder Scrolls IV: Oblivion – a game riddled with nonsense but easily forgiven thanks to the depth of the world and the freedom to decide your path through it.


The writing isn’t quite as consistent as the ideas that underpin it, however, and though dialogue trees rarely collapse into total logical failure, they do sometimes assume knowledge the player has yet to gain, and often have an unreal quality to them – as if human emotions had been explained to the writer secondhand.


Voice-acting is even less reliable, and though some of the robotic bit-parts prompt hearty chuckles, Malcolm McDowell seems to be the only main cast member at home here, albeit underused in his role as the sinister President Eden. Of course, there’s always the option to let your guns do the talking instead.

You can read more of the review here. It's one of the only ones out there by "professional" press that actually takes an indepth look at the whole package.

Spotted @ Planet Fallout

View user's profileSend private messageVisit poster's website
Living Legend
Living Legend

Joined: 18 Apr 2002
Posts: 3050
Location: Melbourne, Futureland

PostPosted: Fri Dec 05, 2008 3:01 am Reply with quoteBack to top

Spot on with the voice acting part. Voice acting was pretty meh, but Malcolm McDowell is brilliant. He, unlike Neeson, actually has a bit of charismatic and distinction in his inflection/tone, where as Neeson just sounds stale.

It also helps that McDowell seems to have a nack of pulling off the patriarchal badguy. His performance in Fallout 3 reminds me alot of his performance in Heroes.
View user's profileSend private messageICQ Number
rad resistance
Striding Hero
Striding Hero

Joined: 17 Dec 2008
Posts: 1435
Location: Penn's Woods

PostPosted: Fri Dec 26, 2008 4:54 am Reply with quoteBack to top

Malcom Mcdowell was fucking brutal in Number 1 Gangster and when i say brutal i mean fucking brutal, but still was a good film.
View user's profileSend private messageSend e-mail
Display posts from previous:      
Post new topicReply to topic

Jump to:  

View next topic
View previous topic
You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot vote in polls in this forum

Powered by phpBB © 2001, 2005 phpBB Group