Ad blocker detected: Our website is made possible by displaying online advertisements to our visitors. Please consider supporting us by disabling your ad blocker on our website.
Talk about music, movies, TV, books, other types of entertainment and what your vices are. Also, if you're addicted to the high you get off Aspirin, this is the place to talk about it.
Bollocks. I sincerely doubt you could resist further opportunities with which to insult, disparage or (huzzah for tradition) call for the banning of your unfortunate victims.
*snorts cocaine*
Dude, I have a life. Correcting grammar takes too much time and effort. I only point out the most glaring, irritating slipups. And usually only if I hate that person.
Situational improvisation I suspect, though if it rings true, you're even more of a cretin than I previously thought.
Subhuman wrote:Dude, I have a life.
If you say so.
Subhuman wrote:Correcting grammar takes too much time and effort.
*snorts*
Oh, this is new !
Subhuman wrote:I only point out the most glaring, irritating slipups.
You must find spelling/grammar errors to be excruciatingly irritating, then. Comparable to a tenacious mosquito the size of a horse perhaps.
Subhuman wrote:And usually only if I hate that person.
Hate ? And you claim to have a life ? Really Darryl, to truly hate so many must be quite the drain upon your time, thought and energy. It must extend into the real and tangible also, how could such turbulence not ? Hyperbole, perhaps ? Let us hope so.
I still don't see your point. Are you saying that I correct grammar? I never disputed that. Are you saying that I never miss an error, and that I always comment on said errors? You're wrong. I don't. That thread is an example of when I did. Are you saying that Lark is a grammar nazi? Are you saying that Michelle was the mole all along? What?
And didn't Teatime mention something about staying on topic?
A little bit of critical reading will show that my point is that, if someone came up with another case of your grammar Nazism not working, you'd pay Blargh mad cash.
EDIT: For a literary type your sure are insistent on not having to infer things.
"You're going to have a tough time doing that without your head, palooka."
- the Vault Dweller
Well, I'll admit that I got confused for a minute. I thought Blargh was talking about my own grammatical errors. Blame it on the Depeche Mode currently blaring in the background. I can't concentrate fully.
So forget everything I said about proving whatever point and let's get back to discussing the merits and debits of mincing British girly men.
Why are discussions between Subhuman, Blargh, and Retlaw (mostly Subhuman) so uninteresting?
suppose you're thinking about a plate of shrimp. suddenly somebody will say like 'plate' or 'shrimp' or 'plate of shrimp', out of the blue, no explanation.
suppose you're thinking about a plate of shrimp. suddenly somebody will say like 'plate' or 'shrimp' or 'plate of shrimp', out of the blue, no explanation.
Subhuman wrote:Actually, I've kinda stopped watching Desperate Housewives. And Alias, for that matter.
Alias lost all credibility for me the minute they changed their introduction. The original title sequence was semi-interesting, now it's looks like it was slung together by a horny 12 year old. Factor in the shitty plot and I've started to stop watching Alias. Lost still rules though.
...
As a side note, I got Season 1 & 2 of Mr. Show with Bob and David. It's kind of meh, but I'm told their 3rd season is where it's at.
atoga wrote:Why are discussions between Subhuman, Blargh, and Retlaw (mostly Subhuman) so uninteresting?
Don't tar us with the same fucking brush, you daft sod, especially when you are frequently guilty of being uninteresting under your own steam. YOU FLAMING HYPOCRITE. Instead, take the righteous, enlightened path : blame the Darryl factor (and perhaps yourself for thinking the impossible). It should be obvious.
