What political party do you subscribe to?

Home of discussion, generally. If it doesn't go in any of the other forums, post it in here.
User avatar
Manoil
Wastelander's Nightmare
Wastelander's Nightmare
Posts: 3701
Joined: Wed Feb 22, 2006 12:05 pm
Location: Drifting Onward

Post by Manoil »

I actually read up on that tax evasion rodeo while looking for a decent picture of him. Hogan's really aged just... horribly. He already had an old face in the 80's, and Father Time has just been the most sadistic bastard possible to Ol' Paulie

Image
Blargh
Ãœberkommando
Ãœberkommando
Posts: 6303
Joined: Sun Nov 09, 2003 7:11 pm

Post by Blargh »

WE CAN'T ALL BE GORGEOUS NONAGENARIANS

:drunk:
User avatar
rad resistance
Striding Hero
Striding Hero
Posts: 1435
Joined: Wed Dec 17, 2008 3:56 am
Location: Penn's Woods

Post by rad resistance »

Looks like Hogan is wearing dentures.
User avatar
Redeye
I lied
I lied
Posts: 4170
Joined: Mon Mar 07, 2005 3:10 pm
Location: filth

Post by Redeye »

Kashluk wrote:With two-party system it'd probably be a fight between A (democrats) and B (republicans), with some third party trying to gather the scraps but to no avail, since the one who gets the majority gets to rule alone without consensus. In a multi-party system a party like D (with issues Y,N,Y) could come along, not win the election, but enforce issues behind which the majority of the actual people are as part of the coalition government. No such option exists in a system which promotes the idea of 'the winner takes it all and leaves no room for deliberation'.
In the US, the majority often has plenty of seats that are in jeopardy, so policies have to be moderated to court Swing Voters and keep the seat. (They can still vote Party Line on high priority things.)

The separation of powers further moderates majority power by breaking up confirmation/adoption processes and providing avenues for override, modification, and obfuscation.

Still, the streamlining of focus in a 2-party system is a major handicap to expression of nuanced viewpoints and varied interests.
("Home District Flavor" in the congress is a weak force in those directions.)


See also:
Spoils system

Agency Capture

These two intertwine.

In the US, Republicans engage in these practices for industry friends and some fundamentalist/etc. elements; Democrats do it for "left" elements and population blocks "in need of help".
Kashluk

Post by Kashluk »

Extremely good points, Redeye. Of course the last two (spoils system and agency capture) are not limited to two-party systems alone, but their effects are enhanced within them.
User avatar
Superhaze
Hero of the Desert
Hero of the Desert
Posts: 1686
Joined: Fri Jan 12, 2007 4:21 am
Location: Far north

Post by Superhaze »

I just wanted to say that Ayn Rand is a bitch.
User avatar
SenisterDenister
Haha you're still not there yet
Haha you're still not there yet
Posts: 3501
Joined: Mon Apr 23, 2007 3:03 pm
Location: Cackalackyland

Post by SenisterDenister »

Superhaze wrote:I just wanted to say that Ayn Rand is a bitch.
Second. Probably created the most destructive "philosophy" for anyone to follow outside of nihilism.
Blargh
Ãœberkommando
Ãœberkommando
Posts: 6303
Joined: Sun Nov 09, 2003 7:11 pm

By virtue of vague

Post by Blargh »

All modes of <strike>philosophic</strike> thought are destructive. Just approach them with an inexorable tenacity. :drunk:
Our Host!
Post Reply