NEW FALLOUT FROM JAPAN

Posted: Tue Mar 22, 2011 2:27 am

For those not down with how a nuklear reactor works let me break it down for you so you can write some slash fix on it ok

essentially a nuclear reactor is like a candle on your desk thats lit alright. but imagine if that candle got super hot thats like a reactor goin critical. you going to put more wax on it, drawn to the flame or is that shit going to melt through your desks crust and creation a 'fission' or fusion reactor as we know them of as in the community of physics and maths.

Posted: Tue Mar 22, 2011 3:34 pm

*sigh* like a mothman to a nuclear reactor, why do i always fall for the str8 guise.

Posted: Tue Mar 22, 2011 7:56 pm

I was entirely unaware until yesterday that Nuclear power plants are basically just complicated and considerably dangerous steam engines. Not trains, but the uranium is used solely to heat water for steam that heats other water for steam that spins a turbine. Why the fuck haven't more resources gone toward electromagnetic perpetual motion generators?

Posted: Tue Mar 22, 2011 8:09 pm

Properly maintained, a nuclear power plant isn't dangerous at all. Everyone freaking out that nuclear power is dangerous after this earthquake is over-reacting.

It's like complaining that an airplane is unsafe because a storm could knock it out of the sky.

Posted: Tue Mar 22, 2011 8:36 pm

an airplane wouldnt cause a TOTAL NUCLEAR DEVASTATION though unless it was a nuclear airplane of course icon_wink

Posted: Tue Mar 22, 2011 10:17 pm

After Three Mile Island and Chernobyl, this may be one of the last nails in the coffin on further expansion into nuclear power in the United States, I think.

Posted: Tue Mar 22, 2011 10:41 pm

And it would be retarded if it was.

Posted: Tue Mar 22, 2011 10:55 pm

Properly maintained, a nuclear power plant isn't dangerous at all. Everyone freaking out that nuclear power is dangerous after this earthquake is over-reacting.

It's like complaining that an airplane is unsafe because a storm could knock it out of the sky.

Posted: Tue Mar 22, 2011 11:12 pm

Fuel rods should get buried under a mountain and DU weapons should be illegal. But that's not the argument - you said nuclear power is dangerous, which I take to mean the generation of nuclear power.

Posted: Tue Mar 22, 2011 11:49 pm

fire fuel rods into space duh dont make mountain sick

its a shame it happened as nuclear power is boss and better than killing thousands of cubans every year in the petrol mines but sometimes they get rescued so thats ok. otherwise yah its a bit of a sham e that because there may be a ATOMIC BOMB DISASTER that people are ignoring all the other shit in japan but dead is dead and im alive so lets go ride a bike which ur bro.

Posted: Wed Mar 23, 2011 2:54 am

I was kind of surprised by that too and made me think that if nuclear plants are doing that then pretty much every other electricity source is probably doing the same. We are using steam power that has been around for more than hundred years? Nothing particularly wrong with that but it's kind of shocking that some smart people haven't rethought that concept.

You know if we were to send nuclear waste into space it would be on the one space rocket that would malfunction and irradiate our atmosphere.

Posted: Wed Mar 23, 2011 2:58 am

My question exactly.

1 - get a piece of metal, a cylindrical magnet and a coil
2 - spend minimal energy getting the piece of metal to start rotation
3 - reap the rewards til the magnetism runs out
4 - re-magnetize teh parts
5 - get proper pissed icon_drunk

6 - rinse and repeet y'all
7 - celibrate mofos!!!!!!1111!!1one2!!!11!!

How 'ard can it be?

Posted: Wed Mar 23, 2011 8:17 am

What did you think that nuclear energy was? Magic radiation reflects on magic stuff to produce magic energy?
Almost every bloody thing we have in terms of producing energy is a variation of the generator.

Solar Energy is the only new technology in terms of usable energy-production we have invented in like 200 years. (Not counting various new forms of electrolysis which aren't viable in the bigger picture)

The reason why stuff like fusion energy (which is in our limited minds is still based on fucking generator technology) and magnetic energy is very obvious and I'm sure you know it.

More stuff like this would render capitalism a historic anecdote.
For fusion energy there would be demands to make it free and community owned and magnetic could be used by people themselves.
I actually read an article about the perpetual electromagnetic machine in some aussie or kiwi newspaper. It was removed some weeks later.

There's some serious research being done in Sweden today on producing bio-fules with some plant that constantly drips it or something. I'm really waiting for this. Put some of these in your garden and completely assrape the oil industry while pushing the economic disparity down a few percent is never wrong.

Posted: Wed Mar 23, 2011 3:44 pm

I think child slaves should be used as our number 1 source of energy.

Posted: Wed Mar 23, 2011 3:49 pm

I agree. Child labor is a cheap and renewable resource.

Posted: Wed Mar 23, 2011 6:36 pm

enslave the irish

Posted: Wed Mar 23, 2011 6:39 pm

And you try to sound and act like some sort of smartass here.
We haven't developed any *energY* efficient way producing children and then using them as some biofule.

Don't you think it takes *energy* to produce the food they will need to eat?

Watched to much Matrix eh Retlaw? Damn you're dumb.

Posted: Wed Mar 23, 2011 6:46 pm

One child slave can produce enough food to easily feed 10-15 child slaves. What's the problem?

Posted: Wed Mar 23, 2011 7:29 pm

children - natures RTS villagers

Posted: Wed Mar 23, 2011 7:53 pm

The Africans seem to crank out children efficiently despite having nothing. Let's use all the African children that are sitting around and starving.

Also, I'm advocating using them for labor, not burning them as fuel. Good God you're a retard.