Flower Power
Username: Password:
Log me on automatically each visit
If you haven't already, you can register an account.
Search News Archives
Use the following form to search for news items which match the selected search criteria.
Interplay vs. Bethesda Clarification
Interplay vs. Bethesda Clarification [ Company -> Update ]
Posted by King of Creation Thu 22 Oct 2009, 2:49 PM
More info on Company: Bethesda Softworks | More info on Company: Interplay

Interplay has filed an 8-K form with the SEC clarifying the problems surrounding their arrangement with Bethesda. Read it for yourself:

On October 16, 2009, Interplay Entertainment Corp. (“Interplay”) answered the lawsuit filed by Bethesda Softworks LLC (“Bethesda”) in the United States District Court for the District of Maryland on September 8, 2009. In conjunction with its Answer, Interplay asserted Counter-Claims against Bethesda seeking affirmative relief, including for Breach of Contract, Declaratory Judgment, and other relief. Interplay alleges Bethesda breached the terms of Asset Purchase Agreement related to the sale of the FALLOUT® intellectual property to Bethesda.

Interplay’s counter-suit alleges that Bethesda interfered with Interplay’s business, including distribution of the previously released FALLOUT ®, FALLOUT® 2, and FALLOUT® Tactics games, by attempting to terminate Interplay’s distribution rights, among other acts. Interplay asks the Court to decide whether Bethesda’s attempt to terminate Interplay’s rights under the Asset Purchase Agreement results in nullification of the entire contract such that the Parties should be returned to the status quo under their former Exclusive Licensing Agreement. If the Exclusive Licensing Agreement is restored, Bethesda may owe royalties based upon sales of its FALLOUT ® 3 title. Interplay also seeks a declaration from the Court that it has not infringed upon the FALLOUT® mark and that it has satisfied the terms of a Trademark Licensing Agreement it signed with Bethesda related to Interplay’s production of a massively-multiplayer online game.

For its part, Bethesda seeks to cancel the Trademark License Agreement, which conditionally allows Interplay to use the FALLOUT ® brand in conjunction with its currently-in-production massively multiplayer online game. Bethesda claims that Interplay breached the trademark license agreement because it allegedly failed to commence full scale development and satisfy a funding requirement within a specified time frame. Bethesda also seeks to terminate Interplay’s rights with respect to Interplay’s distribution of the FALLOUT® back catalog of games. Interplay disputes these allegations. Although the potential damages are currently unknown, if Bethesda ultimately prevails, Bethesda could obtain a damages award and cancel the trademark license agreement. Interplay could lose its license to use the FALLOUT® brand with respect to its massively multiplayer online game, and also its right to distribute the pre-existing FALLOUT® titles.

I can't really comment on the lawsuit beyond my limited knowledge of their original contract, but from what everyone said at the time, Interplay sold absolutely everything to Bethesda except for the MMO deal. If only someone would email me the original contract......

Spotted @ No Mutants Allowed
There are 21 comments on this article. Click here to comment.

^ Support DAC!
Related news items
All news related to Company: Bethesda Softworks
All news related to Company: Interplay
Last 5 news items under Company -> Update
Last 5 news items in the Topic Area: Company
Last 5 news items in the Category: Update
Last 5 news items spotted at No Mutants Allowed
Last 5 news items posted by King of Creation
All news items posted on Thu 22 October 2009


Site hosted by Sorcerer's Place