Get your PC classics at GOG.com
 
   
Headlines
Picture of the Week
Tim Cain, master of Fallout and King of the land.
Poll
Fallout 4 Responses: What do you think of it?
I'm enjoying it! 23%
I like it, but I have a lot of the same frustrations from Fallout 3 23%
I'm not enjoying the new features/additions 7%
I'm dissatisfied and/or hoping Obsidian gets another shot 46%
 
Total Votes: 13
Home of Davide!


Username: Password:
Log me on automatically each visit
If you haven't already, you can register an account.

Search News Archives
 
Use the following form to search for news items which match the selected search criteria.
 
 
 
 
Hellgate: London developer diary
 
Hellgate: London developer diary [ Game -> Preview ]
Posted by Mr. Teatime Thu 05 May 2005, 2:00 PM
More info on Person: Chris Lambert | More info on Game: Hellgate: London

There's a developer diary up on IGN for Hellgate: London, written by one of the game's designers, Chris Lambert. It's about lighting in the game and making it look pretty:

If ever the frame rate drops below a certain threshold during development, the onus is on the graphics engineer to prove it isn't graphics causing the slowdown (maybe physics or AI) or fix it, if graphics code is indeed at fault. In that way, the graphics engineer in a small development team like ours becomes the chief performance engineer as well.
I spend a lot of time profiling the game both for video and CPU performance. My goal is to keep the balance of features, cost and workload between processors in a Happy Place(tm). Every feature has a cost, a minimum hardware spec, a fallback method and a visual or performance benefit. For example, consider full-screen distortion effects like heat shimmering. Their cost is almost purely in pixel shading and texture and framebuffer bandwidth (transferring pixels to and from video memory). That means on computers with really high-end video cards where the CPU is the limiting factor, they are essentially free. Conversely, on the machine with an average video card where pixel-pushing is the bottleneck, they can be incredibly costly. A fallback for those cases would be a cheaper effect (perhaps reducing the number of passes on the effect or using a simple texture lookup in place of more interesting and complex per-pixel math) or getting rid of it altogether. The min-spec would obviously be defined as the point where the technique is unusable. If that's too high and the benefit of the effect is too low (say, it's only used on a tiny stained glass window high up in a wall that you never get close to), it may be dropped in favor of an effect with more bang-for-the-buck.

I guess in a Diablo type game, looking good is one of the main appeals.

Spotted @ Blues News
There are 0 comments on this article. Click here to comment.


^ Support DAC!
Related news items
 
All news related to Person: Chris Lambert
  • Hellgate: London developer diary
All news related to Game: Hellgate: London
Last 5 news items under Game -> Preview
Last 5 news items in the Topic Area: Game
Last 5 news items in the Category: Preview
Last 5 news items spotted at Blues News
Last 5 news items posted by Mr. Teatime
All news items posted on Thu 05 May 2005
  • Hellgate: London developer diary

 

 
 
Hot Topics
 
 
Help Support DAC!
 
 
Community
 
 
International DAC
 
 
Fallout Series
 
 
Official sites
 
 
Features
 
 
Hosted Sites
 
 
Our Friends
 
 
Content
 
 
Site hosted by Sorcerer's Place