Get your PC classics at GOG.com
 
   
Headlines
Picture of the Week
Tim Cain, master of Fallout and King of the land.
Poll
Fallout 4 Responses: What do you think of it?
I'm enjoying it! 23%
I like it, but I have a lot of the same frustrations from Fallout 3 23%
I'm not enjoying the new features/additions 7%
I'm dissatisfied and/or hoping Obsidian gets another shot 46%
 
Total Votes: 13
The source for all your Fallout needs since 1998


Username: Password:
Log me on automatically each visit
If you haven't already, you can register an account.

Search News Archives
 
Use the following form to search for news items which match the selected search criteria.
 
 
 
 
Bethesda's Claim Denied
 
Bethesda's Claim Denied [ Company -> Update ]
Posted by King of Creation Sat 15 Jan 2011, 1:16 AM
More info on Company: Bethesda v. Interplay

A few days ago, we reported that Bethesda was countering Interplay's counter of a motion by Bethesda which sought to limit Interplay's use of the Fallout license to only the name. Bethesda claimed that Interplay, when the original deals were signed selling the Fallout IP to Bethesda, only reserved the right to make a Fallout MMO in name only - the rest of the IP/universe (ie. Supermutants, Brotherhood of Steel, Vaults, etc) could not be used. This motion has been denied, and, as one Interplay insider put it, was "laughed out of court." Here is the full text of the denial:

Motion Hearing held on 1/14/2011 re [93] PARTIAL MOTION to Dismiss Counts I and II of Interplay's Amended Counterclaim filed by Bethesda Softworks LLC - Argued - "DENIED"; Interplay Entertainment Corporation has until February 7, 2011 within which to Comply with the Court's Ruling on Plaintiff's [70] Motion to Compel which was entered on 1/13/2011 (Paper No. 97); and the Parties will jointly advise the Court of any discovery disputes by March 1, 2011, all as stated on the record by Chief Judge Deborah K. Chasanow. (FTR - Derro - 2B) (td, Deputy Clerk)

Our source further speculated on what course the court battle might take:

At issue, will likely be the situation of Masthead saying that they are funding 20 million and I2G saying that they are funding 15 million, but it seems the money isn't all available up front but rather through the course of development. Bethesda argues that Interplay needed a 30 million line of credit up front to meet the contract. Interplay is saying, "No. it is just that we have to spend 30 million on the game through the course of development and have in place deals by the due date that will allow for this eventuality."

Be sure to check out the wiki page detailing the background Interplay v. Bethesda battle if you've forgotten what has led up to this point.

There are 7 comments on this article. Click here to comment.


^ Support DAC!
Related news items
 
All news related to Company: Bethesda v. Interplay
Last 5 news items under Company -> Update
Last 5 news items in the Topic Area: Company
Last 5 news items in the Category: Update
Last 5 news items posted by King of Creation
All news items posted on Sat 15 January 2011
  • Bethesda's Claim Denied

 

 
 
Hot Topics
 
 
Help Support DAC!
 
 
Community
 
 
International DAC
 
 
Fallout Series
 
 
Official sites
 
 
Features
 
 
Hosted Sites
 
 
Our Friends
 
 
Content
 
 
Site hosted by Sorcerer's Place